RESUMEN
Water reuse for potable purposes can represent a realistic source supply of drinking water in areas with water scarcity. Therefore, combining conventional wastewater treatment technologies with advanced technologies is necessary to remove contaminants and obtain high-quality and safe water. In this study, the pesticides and degradation products, atrazine (ATZ), hydroxyatrazine (ATZOH), deethylatrazine (DEA), deisopropylatrazine (DIA), simazine (SMZ), ametryn (AMT), diuron (DIU), 2,4-D, fipronil (FIP), fipronil sulfide (FIP-SF) and fipronil sulfone (FIP-SN) were evaluated in effluent after membrane bioreactor (MBR), effluent after advanced treatment by multiple barriers (MBR, reverse osmosis, UV/H2O2 and activated carbon), in tap water collected in the urban region of Campinas and in the Atibaia River (water supply source from city of Campinas). The pesticide concentrations in the Atibaia River and the post-MBR effluent ranged between 1 and 434 ng L-1 and 1 and 470 ng L-1, respectively. Therefore, the Atibaia River and the post-MBR effluent had the same magnitude pesticide concentrations. In the production of potable water reuse, after the multiple barriers processes, only fipronil (1 ng L-1) and atrazine (3 ng L-1) were quantified in some of the samples. In tap water from Campinas, atrazine, ATZOH, DEA, diuron, and 2,4-D were quantified in concentrations ranging between 3 and 425 ng L-1. Therefore, when comparing drinking water obtained from conventional treatment with potable water reuse, according to the pesticides studied, it is possible to conclude that the advanced treatment used on a pilot scale is promising for use in a potable water reuse plant. However, studies involving more microbiological and chemical parameters should be conducted to classify potable water reuse as drinking water.
RESUMEN
Anthropogenic activities such as agriculture and industry increase contaminants that reach the water bodies, potentially threatening the biota. Most likely, these pollutants occur in complex mixtures. The effects on organisms can be potentiated (synergism) or reduced (antagonism) according to the interaction between the stressors or the species. Cadmium (Cd) is a toxic metal present in phosphate fertilizers, and fipronil is an insecticide broadly used in sugarcane crops. Copepods are important energy transfer links in aquatic environments, and effects on this group impact the whole trophic chain. In this study, we evaluated the responses of the freshwater Calanoida copepod Notodiaptomus iheringi, naturally present in water bodies that can be affected by sugarcane cultures in Brazil. The organisms were exposed to environmental concentrations of Cd and fipronil, isolated and in the mixture, in acute (48 h) and sub-chronic (8 d) tests. Our data indicate that both contaminants affect the survival of the organisms in acute or sub-chronic exposures. Cadmium did not affect egg production or hatching, while fipronil impacted these endpoints negatively. The Cd-fipronil combination resulted in antagonistic responses in survival (acute and sub-chronic) and egg production. A synergistic response was observed in egg hatching. Our results suggest that Cd presents a protective effect in the mixture with fipronil; however, it is not enough to prevent egg-hatching inhibition. These responses highlight how tricky it is to deal with pollutants' interaction in environmental concentrations since synergism is the most common response to metal-pesticide mixtures. Our data point out N. iheringi as a sensitive organism in the presence of contaminants and reflects the threat of chemical mixtures in concentrations found in water bodies close to sugarcane crops in Brazil.
RESUMEN
The magnitude of copepods' responses to pesticides, individually and in mixture, is little understood. The aims of this study were to evaluate: (i) the effects of the pesticides fipronil and 2,4-D, individually and in mixture, on the freshwater copepod Notodiaptomus iheringi; and (ii) the survival and the feeding rate of copepods after the exposure. Acute toxicity tests using the commercial formulations of fipronil and 2,4-D, individually and in mixture, were performed. The LC10-48h, LC20-48h, and LC50-48h of fipronil to N. iheringi were 2.38 ± 0.48, 3.08 ± 1.14, and 4.97 ± 3.30 µg L-1, respectively. For 2,4-D the LC10-48h, LC20-48h, and LC50-48h were 371.18 ± 29.20, 406.93 ± 53.77, and 478.24 ± 107.77 mg L-1, respectively. Morphological damages on the copepods exposed to pesticides were observed at all concentrations. Fungal filaments covering dead organisms were presented at the treatment highest concentration (R5:7.43 ± 2.78 µg L-1 fipronil). The mixture of the pesticides presented synergistic effects on the mortality of N. iheringi. Post-exposure tests showed no difference between the treatments and the control on the mortality and on the feeding rate for 4 h. However, since delayed toxicity of pesticides can occur, longer post-exposure tests using N. iheringi should be tested. N. iheringi is a key species in the aquatic Brazilian ecosystem and showed sensitivity to fipronil and 2,4-D; thus, more studies with this species assessing other responses are recommended.
